How Did GoPro lose $376 Million for Bad Karma?

Did you know that GoPro attributed $376 Million Loss to the development of its drone Program?, notably majority of that was because of Karma.
GoPro Karma

Founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman, GoPro quickly became synonymous with action-packed adventures, offering durable cameras for extreme sports enthusiasts. The brand was built on the idea of capturing the extraordinary.

In 2016, GoPro launched the Karma drone, aiming to complement its cameras with aerial photography capabilities, thereby tapping into the burgeoning consumer drone market.

Unique Value:

  • GoPro marketed Karma as not just a drone but a complete aerial, handheld, and wearable stabilisation solution to differentiate from competitors.
  • Initially, the launch of Karma was expected to open a new revenue stream for GoPro. However, the product was soon recalled due to technical issues, leading to a significant financial hit and a tarnished brand reputation.

But GoPro soon found out $799 was a too steep a price for their crown jewel, which most of the people were not willing to pay.

In 2016-17, shortly after its launch, GoPro has announced that it’s exiting the drone business, citing the challenges of turning a profit in an “extremely competitive” market , saying that its Karma Drone would be the last it would make. The company also laid off hundreds of staff.

Source: droneii.com

Did you know that GoPro had to recall 2500 units just 6 weeks after their launch because of technical failure?

5 Grave Errors that lost $376 Million for GoPro

  1. Technical Oversight: Shortly after its launch, users reported instances of Karma drones losing power mid-flight and crashing.
  2. Recall and Financial Loss: GoPro recalled approximately 2,500 Karma units just weeks after their debut due to the power failure issue, leading to lost sales and increased costs.
  3. Strong Competition: Even as GoPro struggled with technical issues, competitors like DJI were rapidly advancing with more reliable and feature-rich drones, capturing a significant market share.
  4. Market Positioning and Pricing: Karma was priced competitively against DJI’s offerings but lacked distinctive features to command its high price, making it a less appealing choice for potential customers.
  5. Operational Delays: The launch of Karma was delayed by several months, which allowed competitors to solidify their dominance and left GoPro playing catch-up in a fast-evolving market.
GoPro Karma Timeline

How to Avoid the same fate as GoPro’s Karma?

  1. Prioritise Product Testing:
    • Extensive pre-launch testing under various conditions is crucial to identify and mitigate potential failures.
    • Who did it better?: DJI often releases firmware updates that address bugs reported by users, showing their commitment to continuous product improvement after thorough initial testing.
  2. Rapid Response to Failures:
    • Swift and transparent handling of product failures ensures customer trust and brand integrity.
    • Who did it better?: After some of its drones showed battery issues, DJI quickly launched a battery firmware update to solve the problem, minimising customer inconvenience.
  3. Understand the Competitive Landscape:
    • Knowing what the competition offers can help in positioning a product more strategically in the market.
    • Who did it better?: Autel Robotics has successfully positioned its Evo series as a strong alternative to DJI by focusing on customer service and features that appeal to drone enthusiasts in the United States.
  4. Market Timing and Innovation:
    • Timely entry into the market is crucial, but it should not compromise the quality and innovation of the product.
    • Who did it better?:Skydio has carved a niche by focusing on autonomous drones that use AI for obstacle avoidance, differentiating themselves with unique technology rather than competing on existing features alone.
  5. Customer Feedback and Adaptation:
    • Actively seeking and adapting to customer feedback can significantly improve product offerings and increase user satisfaction.
    • Who did it better?:Parrot has adapted its drone offerings by focusing more on professional users in industries like agriculture and filmmaking, responding to market demand for specialized applications.
Subscribe to Beyond Newsletter

Subscribe to receive the latest Newsletter right to your inbox every week.

By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Get access to growth hacks, expert interviews, and evidence-backed advice every week, Exclusive Downloadable Templates and Data Bases.

By clicking Sign Up you're confirming that you agree with our Terms and Conditions.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.