Did you know that GoPro attributed $376 Million Loss to the development of its drone Program?, notably majority of that was because of Karma.

Founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman, GoPro quickly became synonymous with action-packed adventures, offering durable cameras for extreme sports enthusiasts. The brand was built on the idea of capturing the extraordinary.
​

In 2016, GoPro launched the Karma drone, aiming to complement its cameras with aerial photography capabilities, thereby tapping into the burgeoning consumer drone market.
​
​

Unique Value:

‍

• GoPro marketed Karma as not just a drone but a complete aerial, handheld, and wearable stabilisation solution to differentiate from competitors.
• Initially, the launch of Karma was expected to open a new revenue stream for GoPro. However, the product was soon recalled due to technical issues, leading to a significant financial hit and a tarnished brand reputation.

​

But GoPro soon found out $799 was a too steep a price for their crown jewel, which most of the people were not willing to pay.

In 2016-17, shortly after its launch, GoPro has announced that it’s exiting the drone business, citing the challenges of turning a profit in an “extremely competitive” market , saying that its Karma Drone would be the last it would make. The company also laid off hundreds of staff.

​

Did you know that GoPro had to recall 2500 units just 6 weeks after their launch because of technical failure?

5 Grave Errors that lost $376 Million for GoPro

​

1. Technical Oversight: Shortly after its launch, users reported instances of Karma drones losing power mid-flight and crashing.
   ​
2. Recall and Financial Loss: GoPro recalled approximately 2,500 Karma units just weeks after their debut due to the power failure issue, leading to lost sales and increased costs.
   ​
3. Strong Competition: Even as GoPro struggled with technical issues, competitors like DJI were rapidly advancing with more reliable and feature-rich drones, capturing a significant market share.
   ​
4. Market Positioning and Pricing: Karma was priced competitively against DJI’s offerings but lacked distinctive features to command its high price, making it a less appealing choice for potential customers.
   ​
5. Operational Delays: The launch of Karma was delayed by several months, which allowed competitors to solidify their dominance and left GoPro playing catch-up in a fast-evolving market.

​

How to Avoid the same fate as GoPro’s Karma?

1. Prioritise Product Testing:
   • Extensive pre-launch testing under various conditions is crucial to identify and mitigate potential failures.
   • Who did it better?: DJI often releases firmware updates that address bugs reported by users, showing their commitment to continuous product improvement after thorough initial testing.
2. Rapid Response to Failures:
   • Swift and transparent handling of product failures ensures customer trust and brand integrity.
   • Who did it better?: After some of its drones showed battery issues, DJI quickly launched a battery firmware update to solve the problem, minimising customer inconvenience.
3. Understand the Competitive Landscape:
   • Knowing what the competition offers can help in positioning a product more strategically in the market.
   • Who did it better?: Autel Robotics has successfully positioned its Evo series as a strong alternative to DJI by focusing on customer service and features that appeal to drone enthusiasts in the United States.
4. Market Timing and Innovation:
   • Timely entry into the market is crucial, but it should not compromise the quality and innovation of the product.
   • Who did it better?:Skydio has carved a niche by focusing on autonomous drones that use AI for obstacle avoidance, differentiating themselves with unique technology rather than competing on existing features alone.
5. Customer Feedback and Adaptation:
   • Actively seeking and adapting to customer feedback can significantly improve product offerings and increase user satisfaction.
   • Who did it better?:Parrot has adapted its drone offerings by focusing more on professional users in industries like agriculture and filmmaking, responding to market demand for specialized applications.